When an audio enthusiast goes shopping for an amplifier, the question of “how much power do I need?” comes up almost every time. There are a few factors to take into consideration when answering this question. This article looks at those factors and provides some technical background to help support your decision.

Why Do We Need Power?

Quite simply, when you send more power to a speaker, it moves farther and produces more output. Two limiting factors within the speaker itself control how much power it can handle. At higher frequencies, the limit is heat. Speakers are notoriously inefficient. The best convert about 2% of the energy sent to them into sound and the rest is converted to heat. When you send 60 watts of power to a speaker, most of that energy heats up the voice coil and the components around it. Eventually, those components will reach a temperature where they will fail. The speaker will usually stop working at this point, or shortly after.

The second limiting factor is how far the speaker can move. Inexpensive midrange speakers may be able to move back and forth about half an inch without creating massive distortion. Higher-end speakers have as much as twice as much cone excursion capability. (Speakers don’t sound the same at high volumes as they do at low. Audition your speakers at the volume you will be using them.)

Power vs. Output

Power works like this: When you double the power going to a speaker, the output increases by 3 dB. That is not a large amount. In fact, it is the smallest change in amplitude that is perceivable across the audible frequency range. (1 dB is the smallest perceivable change in amplitude where our hearing is most sensitive – 1 to 2 kHz).

Perceived volume is a different beast. An increase of 10 times the power sent to a speaker produces a doubling of perceived volume.

Speaker Efficiency

Another consideration in choosing an amplifier is the efficiency of your speakers. An inexpensive conventional midrange speaker may produce an average output of 91 dB when measured 1 meter away from the speaker cone and when driven with 1 watt of power. A high-quality speaker will likely be less efficient, but capable of playing over a wide range of frequencies. A measurement of 85 dB efficiency at the same distance and power level is not uncommon.

How Loud Do We Need it?

A typical RMS sound pressure level for an orchestra, when you’re seated three or four rows back from the musicians, is around 100 dB. If we use our analogy of the 85 dB efficient speaker, we need 31.6 watts to get that speaker to play 100 dB. The problem is that this is the average power, not the peak power. Perhaps the performance crests at 110 dB? In that case, we need a peak power level of 316 watts. Just keep in mind that the speaker components are likely to melt if you keep this effort up for any significant amount of time.

We don’t suggest buying any speaker based on its efficiency. Criteria like linearity, lack of distortion, application limitations and frequency range are far more important. If you need it loud, buy more speakers, or larger speakers.

Distortion Happens

What happens if we run out of power in an amplifier? We get distortion. This distortion creates all sorts of high-frequency harmonic content. That increased high-frequency energy is what causes tweeters to fail. We need to choose an amplifier that will allow our speakers to play loudly enough without running out of power.

You are better off buying a 100 watt per channel amplifier and only using 50 watts than you are buying a 50 watt amplifier and occasionally causing it to distort. Remember, those 50 extra watts only result in an increase in output of 3 dB – assuming the speaker can handle it.

It Takes Power to Make Power

A consideration that many people overlook is the ability to supply an amplifier with the power it needs to produce the power you want. Modern vehicles have electrical systems with reduced power production capabilities. Smaller alternators, smaller batteries and smaller wiring save weight. Reduced weight transforms into better fuel economy for the vehicle.

As a general rule of thumb for power consumption calculations, you can assume that every 100 watts of power from an amplifier will require about 10 amps of current from your electrical system. Yes, some amplifiers are more efficient than others, but this serves as a good, quick guideline.

If you want to purchase a 650 watt amplifier to power your subwoofer, then your electrical system (battery and alternator) has to be able to provide it with about 65 amps of current. This power requirement is on top of what is required to run the vehicle. The computers, lights, ignition system, radio and heater all consume power as well. On a modern compact car, it would be no surprise if you only had 30 to 40 amps of power left over for an amplifier.

You can get away with a big amplifier – but you can’t play it indefinitely, even with the vehicle running. Once you have exceeded the power delivery capabilities of the amplifier, the battery will start to supply current. You can kill a car battery, even with the vehicle running. Once you shut the car off, you may not have enough energy in the battery to restart it.

Blowing up Amplifiers

Amplifiers do not like to be starved for power. When you run out of power to drive your amplifier, in most cases, the amplifier rail voltage starts to drop. Power starvation causes the maximum undistorted power production of the amplifier to decrease. We are back to the same scenario: Distortion causes harmonics, and harmonics can damage fragile speakers.

If you have had an amplifier fail, and the failure was because the power supply section of the amp self-destructed, chances are you were not able to feed the amp properly.

How Much Amplifier Power Do You Need?

The solution: Buy as much as power as you can afford. Buy the biggest that will physically fit in your application. Get the highest-performance amplifier you can. Make sure your installer uses properly sized wiring to install the amplifier. Upgrade your car battery to a high-performance, high-capacity unit if you need more reserve power.

For more information, visit your local mobile electronics specialist retailer. Be honest about your needs and expectations for your audio system. They will be able to suggest a solution that sounds fantastic and will offer years of reliable performance.

This article is written and produced by the team at www.BestCarAudio.com. Reproduction or use of any kind is prohibited without the express written permission of 1sixty8 media.

You cannot have talked about audio and computers any time in the last 15 years and not have heard of an MP3 file. MP3 audio files and websites, like the original Napster, started a shift in where, how and when people acquired music. If you are on the older end of the spectrum, like many of us in the mobile electronics industry, then you bought your CDs, cassettes and maybe even your vinyl at a record store. Computers and the Internet changed that. You could go online after dinner and download an illegal copy of a song in a few minutes. It was wrong, but people acquired tens of millions of songs this way.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, accessing the Internet was slow. We started connecting to the Internet using phone lines and modems. Each byte of information took time to transfer to your computer, so anything that would speed up the process was a treat. Downloading (stealing) music using the Internet is where the popularity of the MP3 audio file met its calling.

A Primer on Digital Audio

We could write 10 articles about digital audio – and we just might. For now, we are going to look at the basics and use the compact disc (CD) as our reference. CDs store digital audio sampled at 44.1 kHz with a resolution of 16 bits. These numbers mean each sample can have an amplitude that is a single value within a range of 65,536 different levels (2 to the power of 16). The information is sampled 44,100 times a second. Sampling at what is known as 44.1/16 allows capturing the audible range of audio (considered 20 Hz to 20 kHz) with good detail and accuracy.

To store 1 second of audio at this resolution, we need to store 1,411,200 bits of information. Anyone who has played with audio transcoding software may recognize 1,411 kbps as a standard data rate. This number is calculated by multiplying the number bits per sample (16) times the number of samples per second (44,100) times 2. The times-2 factor is because we record in stereo – which is two channels. So, a 3-minute long song is 254,016,000 bits or 31,752,000 bytes.

Let’s round it off to 31 megabytes of information. Can you imagine how long it takes to download that with a dial-up modem running at 14,400 baud? The answer is at least 3.5 minutes – without error checking, line noise and other factors that slow the real download time to about 5.5 minutes.

Data Compression

What if someone found a way to shrink the size of the audio file to speed up download time and reduce bandwidth usage? The caveat is that the audio still sounds essentially the same on most basic audio systems, such as a TV, computer speakers or a 1990s factory car radio. In 1991, a group of companies, including the Fraunhofer Institute, France Telecom, Philips, TDF and IRT, started working on a way to reduce file size while maintaining relevant information. That is the key to how file size is reduced using MP3 compression.

The MP3 file format is a “lossy compression” algorithm. Lossy compression means that information is thrown away to reduce file size. The development team worked on a compression method called perceptual encoding to decide what information to remove. Perceptual encoding is based on how we hear sounds relative to other information, and the limits of our hearing.

What MP3 Files Throw Out

We are going to analyze the information that MP3 files remove to reduce file size. One of the easiest ways to cut back on information storage is to reduce the highest frequency that will be reproduced. If we analyze a 128 kbps MP3 file, we see that the highest reproduced frequency is just below 16 kHz. If that were the only information that was removed, our new bitrate with 16-bit samples in stereo would be about 1,004,800 kbps instead of 1,411,200 kbps for 20.05 kHz.

The next part of the compression process analyzes content that is common to both channels. It is common for some parts of a recording to be virtually in mono. The encoding process removes duplicated information from the file and adds code to copy the opposite channel. If the audio track were purely mono, the file size would be divided in two. Few tracks are completely mono, but we can see more space saving from this process.

Subsequent processing looks at low-level information during high-amplitude passages. Let’s use the example of a song with a lot of bass in it and some very quiet harmonic midrange information. Perceptual encoding processes like MP3 will remove this low-level information from the audio track. This process is called audio masking. There is enough audio information at other frequencies to distract you from hearing what is removed.

Can You Hear the Difference?

Dozens – nay, hundreds – of tests have compared MP3 files to full CD-quality audio tracks. Are there differences? There most certainly are. One thing became apparent during our research: How an MP3 file is created is crucial to its subjective sound quality. Different encoders work in different ways with different results.

Perhaps the best way to describe the difference between a CD-quality recording and an MP3 file is to look at the difference between the two. I wish we could share some samples here for you to listen to, but that would break copyright laws. What we can do is visually show you the difference.

We took a 3-second sample from Daft Punk’s “Give Life Back to Music.” We chose this track because of Daft Punk’s clear and conscious effort to make a high-resolution version of the album commercially available. We want to thank them for that! The sample is from 31.5 seconds to 34.5 seconds into the song.

This Spectrogram shows the frequency content of the sample. The horizontal scale is time. The vertical scale is frequency. Finally, the color intensity shows the amplitude.

You can see that there is frequency content up to 30 kHz, clearly demonstrating the high-resolution nature of this track. Each vertical color band represents a drum machine beat – more or less.

128 kbs MP3 File Analyzation

It is clear that audio information above 16 kHz has been removed. Infrasonic frequency content is clearly different as well. There is more information in the MP3 file below 30 Hz compared to the original. This increase in information will, however, present itself as less-dynamic range.

MP3 Vs Original File

We inverted the MP3 file and added it to the original sample to make the image you see here. The net result is the difference between the two tracks. You can see the high-frequency content that was removed above 16 kHz. In fact, information was removed at all frequencies, and that information follows the intensity pattern of the audio file.

The original file has a peak amplitude of -0.1 dB for both channels and an average amplitude of about -14.2 dB. The removed information has a peak level of -10.9 dB and an average amplitude of -37.01. The removed information is buried deep below the peak amplitude information.

What does the removed audio sound like? We would describe the clip as the sound of a distant marching band. The audio is mostly high-frequency information. The track has a decidedly warbled texture to it as well: The drum machine beats are clear and present, but they sound like distorted cymbal hits.

Even with a high-end headphone preamp and studio grade headphones, the difference is hard to perceive when switching between the original track and the MP3 file. In a listening environment with a larger soundstage, it may be more apparent.

Conclusions about MP3 Files

Purists will tell you that you should have the highest-quality recordings available. There is no fault to this logic. Why skimp when you can have it all? High bitrate MP3 files, like those at 320 kbps, for example, are excellent in quality. Repeated testing has shown that when created with quality compression algorithms, the sound difference between a CD-quality recording and a 320 kbps MP3 file is almost impossible to detect. Lower bitrate MP3 files start to dispose of more information, and the differences become bigger.

The latest source units on the market are capable of playing WAV and FLAC audio files of great resolution and bit depth. Shortly, we will see units that will play MQA files over digital connections. Almost every source will handle MP3 and WMA files.

Drop into your local mobile electronics specialist retailer today, and bring along some music to enjoy. We think you will be impressed – no matter what format you choose.

This article is written and produced by the team at www.BestCarAudio.com. Reproduction or use of any kind is prohibited without the express written permission of 1sixty8 media.